Health care reform

Overseas Healthcare

Just the fact ma'am.

If you don't have time to read it, consider this:

The world champion at controlling medical costs is Japan, even though
its aging population is a profligate consumer of medical care. On
average, the Japanese go to the doctor 15 times a year, three times the
U.S. rate. They have twice as many MRI scans and X-rays. Quality is
high; life expectancy and recovery rates for major diseases are better
than in the United States.

And yet Japan spends about $3,400 per person annually on health care; the United States spends more than $7,000.

Health care reform

Mr Potter sees the light on the health care industry

A different view of the debate from Kristoff in the NY Times this morning…

Opponents suggest that a “government takeover” of health care will
be a milestone on the road to “socialized medicine,” and when he hears
those terms, Wendell Potter cringes. He’s embarrassed that opponents
are using a playbook that he helped devise.

“Over the years I helped craft this messaging and deliver it,” he noted.

Mr. Potter was an executive in the health insurance industry for
nearly 20 years before his conscience got the better of him. He served
as head of corporate communications for Humana and then for Cigna.

He flew in corporate jets to industry meetings to plan how to block
health reform, he says. He rode in limousines to confabs to concoct
messaging to scare the public about reform. But in his heart, he began
to have doubts as the business model for insurance evolved in recent
years from spreading risk to dumping the risky.

Then in 2007 Mr. Potter attended a premiere of “Sicko,” Michael
Moore’s excoriating film about the American health care system. Mr.
Potter was taking notes so that he could prepare a propaganda
counterblast — but he found himself agreeing with a great deal of the
film.

A month later, Mr. Potter was back home in Tennessee, visiting his
parents, and dropped in on a three-day charity program at a county
fairgrounds to provide medical care for patients who could not afford
doctors. Long lines of people were waiting in the rain, and patients
were being examined and treated in public in stalls intended for
livestock.

“It was a life-changing event to witness that,” he remembered.
Increasingly, he found himself despising himself for helping block
health reforms. “It sounds hokey, but I would look in the mirror and
think, how did I get into this?”

Mr. Potter loved his office, his executive salary, his bonus, his
stock options. “How can I walk away from a job that pays me so well?”
he wondered. But at the age of 56, he announced his retirement and left
Cigna last year.

This year, he went public with his concerns, testifying before a Senate committee investigating the insurance industry.

“I knew that once I did that my life would be different,” he said.
“I wouldn’t be getting any more calls from recruiters for the health
industry. It was the scariest thing I have done in my life. But it was
the right thing to do.”

Mr. Potter says he liked his colleagues and bosses in the insurance
industry, and respected them. They are not evil. But he adds that they
are removed from the consequences of their decisions, as he was, and
are obsessed with sustaining the company’s stock price — which means
paying fewer medical bills.

One way to do that is to deny requests for expensive procedures. A
second is “rescission” — seizing upon a technicality to cancel the
policy of someone who has been paying premiums and finally gets cancer
or some other expensive disease. A Congressional investigation into
rescission found that three insurers, including Blue Cross of
California, used this technique to cancel more than 20,000 policies
over five years, saving the companies $300 million in claims.

As The Los Angeles Times has reported,
insurers encourage this approach through performance evaluations. One
Blue Cross employee earned a perfect evaluation score after dropping
thousands of policyholders who faced nearly $10 million in medical
expenses.

Mr. Potter notes that a third tactic is for insurers to raise
premiums for a small business astronomically after an employee is found
to have an illness that will be very expensive to treat. That forces
the business to drop coverage for all its employees or go elsewhere.

All this is monstrous, and it negates the entire point of insurance, which is to spread risk.

The insurers are open to one kind of reform — universal coverage
through mandates and subsidies, so as to give them more customers and
more profits. But they don’t want the reforms that will most help
patients, such as a public insurance option, enforced competition and
tighter regulation.

Mr. Potter argues that much tougher regulation is essential. He also
believes that a robust public option is an essential part of any health
reform, to compete with for-profit insurers and keep them honest.

As a nation, we’re at a turning point. Universal health coverage has
been proposed for nearly a century in the United States. It was in an
early draft of Social Security.

Yet each time, it has been defeated in part by fear-mongering
industry lobbyists. That may happen this time as well — unless the
Obama administration and Congress defeat these manipulative special
interests. What’s un-American isn’t a greater government role in health
care but an existing system in which Americans without insurance get
health care, if at all, in livestock pens.

Health care reform

Obama “kills off” (ha ha) Death Panel talk.

(Dailykos)

President Obama in this morning's weekly address warned Americans
that his foes will "scare and mislead" in order to preserve the status
quo as they fight his lead in reforming health care, and he once again
shot down the "death panel" silliness:

…let’s look at one of the scarier-sounding and more ridiculous
rumors out there – that so-called "death panels" would decide whether
senior citizens get to live or die.  That rumor began with the
distortion of one idea in a Congressional bill that would allow
Medicare to cover voluntary visits with your doctor to discuss your
end-of-life care – if and only if you decide to have those visits.  It
had nothing to do with putting government in control of your decisions;
in fact, it would give you all the information you need – if you want
it – to put you in control of your decisions. When a conservative
Republican Senator who has long-fought for even more far-reaching
proposals found out how folks were twisting the idea, he called their
misrepresentation, and I quote, "nuts."

He reiterated the now familiar requirements of what he's advocating,
including eliminating caps on coverage and pre-existing condition
exclusions as well as requirements for coverage of preventive care.

And, in case anyone has forgotten since the last one hundred times he's said it: If you want to keep your own doctor, you can.

He evoked the spirits and battles of Democratic presidents in the
past and reminded Americans of the hard fights and ridiculous
scare-mongering faced by his predecessors:

So when folks with a stake in the status quo keep inventing these
boogeymen in an effort to scare people, it’s disappointing, but it’s
not surprising.  We’ve seen it before.  When President Roosevelt was
working to create Social Security, opponents warned it would open the
door to "federal snooping" and force Americans to wear dog tags.  When
President Kennedy and President Johnson were working to create
Medicare, opponents warned of "socialized medicine."  Sound familiar?
 Not only were those fears never realized, but more importantly, those
programs have saved the lives of tens of millions of seniors, the
disabled, and the disadvantaged….

Nearly fifty years ago, in the midst of the noisy early battles to
create what would become Medicare, President Kennedy said, "I refuse to
see us live on the accomplishments of another generation.  I refuse to
see this country, and all of us, shrink from these struggles which are
our responsibility in our time."  Now it falls to us to meet the
challenges of our time.  And if we can come together, and listen to one
another; I believe, as I always have, that we will rise to this moment,
we will build something better for our children, and we will secure
America’s future in this new century.

Health care reform

Fat tax in Denmark

Another from Morning Newsbeat. Kevin's on fire this morning…

Denmark Adopts Fat Tax

There has been a lot of discussion here on MorningNewsBeat in recent weeks about the possibility of a fat tax in the US, which led one MNB user to point out to us that Denmark is actually imposing one, with extra taxes ladled on foods that are considered unhealthy – a move that is designed to promote healthy eating and reduce that nation’s obesity problem.

These taxes are scheduled to kick in at the beginning of next year.